Unfair Advantage - Update
posted by Dzeni at 12:44 AMThe whole "Vote for my Art" situation has not changed that much since yesterday but I learned something quite important today that is relevant.
Turns out that the paper which published the article I was complaining about in my last post acted totally appropriately. In fact, the issue lies with my local newspaper which had access to the same information as the paper from "Out West". Both publications were encouraged to publish news about the competition and the various entries by the competition organisers - only one of them did.
To make matter worse, when I contacted my local rag and asked for their assistance late yesterday, their chief reporter politely informed me that it was too late as Friday's paper has already been "put to bed". You can imagine my frustration when I learned that my local paper had in fact known about the competition for almost a month and, despite being encouraged to report on it, had failed to do so.
The situation is still rather unfair but any blame should be leveled at my local paper which failed to act. At this point I'm wondering why they even have an art reporter.
Of course I still need votes - now more than ever! It will be interesting to see which piece wins as clearly this contest is less about art than exposure - which is a fairly regrettable state of affairs.
Edit: This competition has now closed. The official results will be announced in March to coincide with the publication of the Auckland White Pages. I'll let you all know the result in due course.
Labels: competitions




